Correct your read against what the team would actually say, and gauge how deep the trouble runs, because the leader’s view of team health is almost always kinder than the team’s, and depth decides how much to take on and how fast.
Answer each yourself, then get the honest staff read through whatever channel will actually tell the truth, a trusted manager, an anonymous pulse, or a plain conversation. Where their answer is worse, trust theirs.
| The honest question | Your read | What your people would say |
|---|---|---|
| Would your people say the pace here is survivable? | ||
| Would they say they feel seen, that they belong, that the work still matters to them? | ||
| Would they say the way people treat each other here is good? | ||
| Would they say the parts of the organization work together? | ||
| Would they say they can raise a hard thing honestly and be heard? |
The test: is there a real gap between how it feels to you and how it feels to them? If you found no gap at all, you probably did not get an honest read, because there almost always is one.
One hard signal to watch for: if the honest staff read keeps pointing at the leadership itself, at you or your senior team, as the source of what is wrong, take that seriously rather than defensively. A culture cannot be repaired around the people who set its tone, so that routes to the leadership work, and where the board must act, to the board and governance work.
Your answers stay in your browser on this page and are never sent anywhere. Use Save or print to keep your copy.